Fewer than half across regions and demographic groups approve of Congress. Approval in March was at 44 percent for adults and 39 percent for likely voters. Across demographic groups, about half or more approve among women, younger adults, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Latinos.

Views are similar across education and income groups, with just fewer than half approving. Approval in March was at 41 percent for adults and 36 percent for likely voters. Across regions, approval reaches a majority only in the San Francisco Bay Area. Across demographic groups, approval reaches a majority only among African Americans. This map highlights the five geographic regions for which we present results; these regions account for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas in gray are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

The PPIC Statewide Survey is directed by Mark Baldassare, president and CEO and survey director at the Public Policy Institute of California. Coauthors of this report include survey analyst Deja Thomas, who was the project manager for this survey; associate survey director and research fellow Dean Bonner; and survey analyst Rachel Lawler. The Californians and Their Government survey is supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F. Findings in this report are based on a survey of 1, California adult residents, including 1, interviewed on cell phones and interviewed on landline telephones.

The sample included respondents reached by calling back respondents who had previously completed an interview in PPIC Statewide Surveys in the last six months. Interviews took an average of 19 minutes to complete. Interviewing took place on weekend days and weekday nights from October 14—23, Cell phone interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of cell phone numbers. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of cell phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All cell phone numbers with California area codes were eligible for selection. After a cell phone user was reached, the interviewer verified that this person was age 18 or older, a resident of California, and in a safe place to continue the survey e. Cell phone respondents were offered a small reimbursement to help defray the cost of the call. Cell phone interviews were conducted with adults who have cell phone service only and with those who have both cell phone and landline service in the household.

Landline interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers that ensured that both listed and unlisted numbers were called. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of landline phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All landline telephone exchanges in California were eligible for selection. For both cell phones and landlines, telephone numbers were called as many as eight times. When no contact with an individual was made, calls to a number were limited to six. Also, to increase our ability to interview Asian American adults, we made up to three additional calls to phone numbers estimated by Survey Sampling International as likely to be associated with Asian American individuals.

Accent on Languages, Inc. The survey sample was closely comparable to the ACS figures. To estimate landline and cell phone service in California, Abt Associates used state-level estimates released by the National Center for Health Statistics—which used data from the National Health Interview Survey NHIS and the ACS.

The estimates for California were then compared against landline and cell phone service reported in this survey. We also used voter registration data from the California Secretary of State to compare the party registration of registered voters in our sample to party registration statewide.

The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is ±3. This means that 95 times out of , the results will be within 3. The sampling error for unweighted subgroups is larger: for the 1, registered voters, the sampling error is ±4. For the sampling errors of additional subgroups, please see the table at the end of this section. Sampling error is only one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by factors such as question wording, question order, and survey timing.

We present results for five geographic regions, accounting for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

We also present results for congressional districts currently held by Democrats or Republicans, based on residential zip code and party of the local US House member. We compare the opinions of those who report they are registered Democrats, registered Republicans, and no party preference or decline-to-state or independent voters; the results for those who say they are registered to vote in other parties are not large enough for separate analysis. We also analyze the responses of likely voters—so designated per their responses to survey questions about voter registration, previous election participation, intentions to vote this year, attention to election news, and current interest in politics.

The percentages presented in the report tables and in the questionnaire may not add to due to rounding. Additional details about our methodology can be found at www. pdf and are available upon request through surveys ppic. October 14—23, 1, California adult residents; 1, California likely voters English, Spanish. Margin of error ±3. Percentages may not add up to due to rounding.

Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that Gavin Newsom is handling his job as governor of California? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that the California Legislature is handling its job?

Do you think things in California are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? Thinking about your own personal finances—would you say that you and your family are financially better off, worse off, or just about the same as a year ago?

Next, some people are registered to vote and others are not. Are you absolutely certain that you are registered to vote in California?

Are you registered as a Democrat, a Republican, another party, or are you registered as a decline-to-state or independent voter? Would you call yourself a strong Republican or not a very strong Republican? Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or Democratic Party? Which one of the seven state propositions on the November 8 ballot are you most interested in?

Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. It allows in-person sports betting at racetracks and tribal casinos, and requires that racetracks and casinos that offer sports betting to make certain payments to the state—such as to support state regulatory costs.

The fiscal impact is increased state revenues, possibly reaching tens of millions of dollars annually. Some of these revenues would support increased state regulatory and enforcement costs that could reach the low tens of millions of dollars annually.

If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 26? Initiative Constitutional Amendment. It allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. It directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, and nonparticipating tribes. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 27?

Initiative Statute. It allocates tax revenues to zero-emission vehicle purchase incentives, vehicle charging stations, and wildfire prevention. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 30?

Do you agree or disagree with these statements? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that Joe Biden is handling his job as president? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Alex Padilla is handling his job as US Senator? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Dianne Feinstein is handling her job as US Senator? A lack of banking options delayed some households from getting federal payments aimed at helping the country weather the economic fallout from the COVID health crisis.

Battle against predatory lending: Mississippi social justice firm fights payday 'predatory lending' in low-income communities. Checks arrived late for some of the unbanked: For 'unbanked' Americans, pandemic stimulus checks arrived slowly and with higher fees. But that could change. The FDIC initiated an educational campaign to get more Americans to open an account to enable the direct deposit of those funds. And banks such as Capital One and Ally Financial ended overdraft and other fees that have been a key barrier to some Americans accessing the banking system.

A household is deemed unbanked when no one in the home has an account with a bank or credit union. That share of households has dropped by nearly half since Từ đó các nhà đầu tư quyết định chốt lời thu được lợi nhuận.

So với việc không sử dụng chỉ số Fibonacci việc chốt lời theo cảm tính, tính toán không chuẩn xác hoặc mơ hồ không có căn cứ thì có sự xuất hiện của Fibonacci rõ ràng mang lại hiệu quả giao dịch Forex tốt hơn nhiều. Tuy nhiên, Devlin cũng cho biết Leonardo ở Pisa đã không thực sự phát hiện ra dãy số. Các văn bản tiếng Phạn cổ đại sử dụng hệ thống chữ số Ấn Độ giáo-Ả Rập cũng đề cập đến những dãy số này, và những văn bản này có trước Leonardo of Pisa hàng thế kỷ. Cuốn sách này viết cho các nhà kinh doanh và là công cụ hữu ích để theo dõi lợi nhuận, thua lỗ, số dư khoản vay còn lại….

Ở một vị trí trong cuốn sách, Leonardo of Pisa giới thiệu trình tự với một vấn đề liên quan đến thỏ. Bài toán diễn ra như sau: Bắt đầu với một con thỏ đực và một con thỏ cái.

Sau một tháng, chúng trưởng thành và sinh ra một lứa với một con thỏ đực và cái khác. Tháng sau, những con thỏ sinh sản và xuất hiện thêm một con đực và con cái khác, chúng cũng có thể giao phối sau một tháng. Sau một năm, bạn sẽ có bao nhiêu con thỏ? Câu trả lời là — và công thức được sử dụng để đi đến câu trả lời đó là thứ hiện nay được gọi là dãy Fibonacci. Nhưng sau một vài đoạn ngắn về việc chăn nuôi thỏ, Leonardo of Pisa không bao giờ đề cập đến trình tự nữa.

Trên thực tế, nó hầu như bị lãng quên cho đến thế kỷ 19, khi các nhà toán học nghiên cứu thêm về các tính chất toán học của dãy số. Hai đại lượng được gọi là có tỷ lệ vàng nếu tỷ số giữa tổng của các đại lượng đó với đại lượng lớn hơnbằng tỷ số giữa đại lượng lớn hơn với đại lượng nhỏ hơn.

Tỷ lệ vàng ký hiệu là φ đọc là phi đặt theo tên gọi của kiến trúc sư Phidias, người đầu tiên ứng dụng thành công tỉ lệ vàng vào kỳ quan Parthenon. Giữa tỉ lệ vàng và Fibonacci luôn có sự liên hệ chặt chẽ với nhau. Một điều khá thú vị là số liên tiếp trong dãy Fibonacci khi chia cho nhau luôn đạt kết quả xấp xỉ 1. Liên hệ giữa tỷ lệ vàng và dãy số Fibonacci: 2 số liên tiếp bất kỳ trong dãy Fibonacci đều có tỷ số gần bằng tỷ lệ vàng. Tỉ lệ vàng xuất hiện một cách dày đặc trong tự nhiên và được con người áp dụng vào rất nhiều mặt trong đời sống.

Các công trình nhân tạo khi ứng dụng tỷ lệ vàng vào thiết kế đều tỏ ra hài hòa, cân đối, có sức hút kỳ lạ và đặc biệt là có sức bền rất lớn. Điển hình như kim tự tháp Giza ở Ai Cập, đền Parthenon ở Hi Lạp, bức họa Mona Lisa của Da Vinci …. Ngày nay, tỷ lệ vàng xuất hiện hầu hết trong logo của những công ty lớn như Apple, Adidas, Pepsi, Twitter … Đó là lý do tại sao nó đem cho ta sự thoả mãn về mặt thị giác.

Đó chính là nét đẹp thuần khiết từ tự nhiên. Các tỷ lệ Fibonacci đóng vai trò quan trọng trong cách vận động của giá, cũng như cách nó xuất hiện trong tự nhiên và có thể được sử dụng để xác định các điểm quan trọng trong quá trình di chuyển của giá. Trong các Fibonacci thì Fibonacci Retracement được sử dụng phổ biến nhất vì đơn giản trong cách thức và khả năng ứng dụng được trong rất nhiều loại tài sản khác nhau.

Cụ thể là chúng được dùng để xác định ra các mức hỗ trợ, kháng cự, đặt lệnh dừng lỗ hay giúp các trader nhằm xác định giá mục tiêu. Tuy nhiên, Fibonacci có rất nhiều ưu điểm và là công cụ hữu ích trên thị trường chứng khoán nhưng cũng tồn tại điểm hạn chế.

Đó là dù các mức Fibonacci chỉ ra điểm hỗ hoặc hay kháng cự tiềm nặng nhưng không hoàn toàn chắc chắn giá sẽ phản ứng tốt với các mức đưa ra đó. Vậy nên các nhà đầu tư mới hay phải kết hợp Fibonacci với nhiều tín hiệu khác. Ngoài ra, một số trường hợp Fibonacci có nhiều đường cản giá nên giá hay bị đảo quay lại tại các đường này. Vì thế khiến cho các nhà đầu tư không xác định chuẩn đâu là ngưỡng cản an toàn để tính toán. Fibonacci là công cụ phân tích kỹ thuật quan trọng giúp cho các nhà đầu tư Forex có thể xác định được ngưỡng hỗ trợ và kháng cự.

Từ đó giúp dễ dàng xác định hành vi mua, bán chuẩn xác. Và các chỉ số này sẽ phát huy được giá trị tối đa khi thị trường đang có xu hướng rõ rệt. Một số loại Fibonacci bao gồm. Fibonacci retracement là một công cụ rất phổ biến, được sử dụng nhiều bởi các nhà giao dịch theo trường phái kỹ thuật.

Bằng các ngưỡng kháng cự và hỗ trợ, công cụ này giúp họ xây dựng chiến lược trong giao dịch, lựa chọn các mức giá mục tiêu hoặc cắt lỗ hợp lý. Khái niệm Fibonacci thoái lui còn được áp dụng trong một số chỉ báo như mẫu hình Gartley hay lý thuyết sóng Elliott nổi tiếng và nhiều chỉ báo khác. Sau những đợt biến động tăng hoặc giảm giá đáng kể, các mức hỗ trợ và kháng cự mới sẽ thường xuất hiện tại hoặc gần các đường thoái lui quan trọng Sau đó tiến hành vẽ FR cho 1 xu hướng tăng qua việc kéo con trỏ từ đáy lên đến đỉnh của cả đoạn xu hướng tăng.

Và các mức FR là ngưỡng hỗ trợ rất tiềm năng cho các trader, giá sẽ xu hướng tăng nếu chạm được 1 trong các mức FR ở trên. Còn xu hướng giảm thì vẽ với việc kéo con trỏ đi từ đỉnh xuống đáy của đoạn xu hướng giảm. Các mức FR thể hiện là các ngưỡng kháng cự tiềm năng, giá sẽ dứt điểm điều điều chỉnh tăng và sẽ giảm nếu chạm được vào một trong các mức FR. Đối với dạng Fibonacci này thì đây là công cụ giúp các trader thoát lệnh hay chốt lời theo mong muốn.

FE Fibonacci time Extension sẽ tìm được các mức giá mà một xu hướng có thể chạm tới. Sau đó xác định 3 điểm với xu hướng tăng: đáy, đỉnh và điểm đảo chiều. Bạn sẽ thực hiện kéo con trỏ từ đáy lên đến đỉnh và rồi nhả chuột ra. Nhấp kích đúp chuột vào điểm thứ ba lại kéo đến điểm đảo chiều. Với xu hướng giảm bạn cũng xác định 3 điểm: đỉnh, đáy và điểm đảo chiều.

Tiếp theo thì bạn sẽ kéo con trỏ từ đỉnh xuống đáy r.

Please check back soon for future events, and sign up to receive invitations to our events and briefings. December 1, Speaker Series on California's Future — Virtual Event.

November 30, Virtual Event. November 18, Annual Water Conference — In-Person and Online. We believe in the power of good information to build a brighter future for California.

Help support our mission. Mark Baldassare , Dean Bonner , Rachel Lawler , and Deja Thomas. Supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F. Miller Foundation and the James Irvine Foundation. California voters have now received their mail ballots, and the November 8 general election has entered its final stage. Amid rising prices and economic uncertainty—as well as deep partisan divisions over social and political issues—Californians are processing a great deal of information to help them choose state constitutional officers and state legislators and to make policy decisions about state propositions.

The midterm election also features a closely divided Congress, with the likelihood that a few races in California may determine which party controls the US House. These are among the key findings of a statewide survey on state and national issues conducted from October 14 to 23 by the Public Policy Institute of California:.

Today, there is a wide partisan divide: seven in ten Democrats are optimistic about the direction of the state, while 91 percent of Republicans and 59 percent of independents are pessimistic. Californians are much more pessimistic about the direction of the country than they are about the direction of the state.

Majorities across all demographic groups and partisan groups, as well as across regions, are pessimistic about the direction of the United States. A wide partisan divide exists: most Democrats and independents say their financial situation is about the same as a year ago, while solid majorities of Republicans say they are worse off.

Regionally, about half in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles say they are about the same, while half in the Central Valley say they are worse off; residents elsewhere are divided between being worse off and the same. The shares saying they are worse off decline as educational attainment increases.

Strong majorities across partisan groups feel negatively, but Republicans and independents are much more likely than Democrats to say the economy is in poor shape. Today, majorities across partisan, demographic, and regional groups say they are following news about the gubernatorial election either very or fairly closely.

In the upcoming November 8 election, there will be seven state propositions for voters. Due to time constraints, our survey only asked about three ballot measures: Propositions 26, 27, and For each, we read the proposition number, ballot, and ballot label. Two of the state ballot measures were also included in the September survey Propositions 27 and 30 , while Proposition 26 was not.

This measure would allow in-person sports betting at racetracks and tribal casinos, requiring that racetracks and casinos offering sports betting make certain payments to the state to support state regulatory costs. It also allows roulette and dice games at tribal casinos and adds a new way to enforce certain state gambling laws. Fewer than half of likely voters say the outcome of each of these state propositions is very important to them.

Today, 21 percent of likely voters say the outcome of Prop 26 is very important, 31 percent say the outcome of Prop 27 is very important, and 42 percent say the outcome of Prop 30 is very important. Today, when it comes to the importance of the outcome of Prop 26, one in four or fewer across partisan groups say it is very important to them.

About one in three across partisan groups say the outcome of Prop 27 is very important to them. Fewer than half across partisan groups say the outcome of Prop 30 is very important to them.

When asked how they would vote if the election for the US House of Representatives were held today, 56 percent of likely voters say they would vote for or lean toward the Democratic candidate, while 39 percent would vote for or lean toward the Republican candidate.

Democratic candidates are preferred by a point margin in Democratic-held districts, while Republican candidates are preferred by a point margin in Republican-held districts. Abortion is another prominent issue in this election. When asked about the importance of abortion rights, 61 percent of likely voters say the issue is very important in determining their vote for Congress and another 20 percent say it is somewhat important; just 17 percent say it is not too or not at all important.

With the controlling party in Congress hanging in the balance, 51 percent of likely voters say they are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for Congress this year; another 29 percent are somewhat enthusiastic while 19 percent are either not too or not at all enthusiastic.

Today, Democrats and Republicans have about equal levels of enthusiasm, while independents are much less likely to be extremely or very enthusiastic.

As Californians prepare to vote in the upcoming midterm election, fewer than half of adults and likely voters are satisfied with the way democracy is working in the United States—and few are very satisfied. Satisfaction was higher in our February survey when 53 percent of adults and 48 percent of likely voters were satisfied with democracy in America. Today, half of Democrats and about four in ten independents are satisfied, compared to about one in five Republicans. Notably, four in ten Republicans are not at all satisfied.

In addition to the lack of satisfaction with the way democracy is working, Californians are divided about whether Americans of different political positions can still come together and work out their differences.

Forty-nine percent are optimistic, while 46 percent are pessimistic. Today, in a rare moment of bipartisan agreement, about four in ten Democrats, Republicans, and independents are optimistic that Americans of different political views will be able to come together.

Notably, in , half or more across parties, regions, and demographic groups were optimistic. Today, about eight in ten Democrats—compared to about half of independents and about one in ten Republicans—approve of Governor Newsom. Across demographic groups, about half or more approve of how Governor Newsom is handling his job. Approval of Congress among adults has been below 40 percent for all of after seeing a brief run above 40 percent for all of Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to approve of Congress.

Fewer than half across regions and demographic groups approve of Congress. Approval in March was at 44 percent for adults and 39 percent for likely voters. Across demographic groups, about half or more approve among women, younger adults, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Latinos. Views are similar across education and income groups, with just fewer than half approving. Approval in March was at 41 percent for adults and 36 percent for likely voters.

Across regions, approval reaches a majority only in the San Francisco Bay Area. Across demographic groups, approval reaches a majority only among African Americans. This map highlights the five geographic regions for which we present results; these regions account for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas in gray are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

The PPIC Statewide Survey is directed by Mark Baldassare, president and CEO and survey director at the Public Policy Institute of California. Coauthors of this report include survey analyst Deja Thomas, who was the project manager for this survey; associate survey director and research fellow Dean Bonner; and survey analyst Rachel Lawler. The Californians and Their Government survey is supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F.

Findings in this report are based on a survey of 1, California adult residents, including 1, interviewed on cell phones and interviewed on landline telephones. The sample included respondents reached by calling back respondents who had previously completed an interview in PPIC Statewide Surveys in the last six months.

Interviews took an average of 19 minutes to complete. Interviewing took place on weekend days and weekday nights from October 14—23, Cell phone interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of cell phone numbers. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of cell phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All cell phone numbers with California area codes were eligible for selection. After a cell phone user was reached, the interviewer verified that this person was age 18 or older, a resident of California, and in a safe place to continue the survey e. Cell phone respondents were offered a small reimbursement to help defray the cost of the call.

Cell phone interviews were conducted with adults who have cell phone service only and with those who have both cell phone and landline service in the household. Landline interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers that ensured that both listed and unlisted numbers were called. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of landline phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All landline telephone exchanges in California were eligible for selection. For both cell phones and landlines, telephone numbers were called as many as eight times.

When no contact with an individual was made, calls to a number were limited to six. Also, to increase our ability to interview Asian American adults, we made up to three additional calls to phone numbers estimated by Survey Sampling International as likely to be associated with Asian American individuals.

Accent on Languages, Inc. The survey sample was closely comparable to the ACS figures. To estimate landline and cell phone service in California, Abt Associates used state-level estimates released by the National Center for Health Statistics—which used data from the National Health Interview Survey NHIS and the ACS.

The estimates for California were then compared against landline and cell phone service reported in this survey. We also used voter registration data from the California Secretary of State to compare the party registration of registered voters in our sample to party registration statewide.

The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is ±3. This means that 95 times out of , the results will be within 3. The sampling error for unweighted subgroups is larger: for the 1, registered voters, the sampling error is ±4.

For the sampling errors of additional subgroups, please see the table at the end of this section. Sampling error is only one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by factors such as question wording, question order, and survey timing. We present results for five geographic regions, accounting for approximately 90 percent of the state population.

Residents of other geographic areas are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

We also present results for congressional districts currently held by Democrats or Republicans, based on residential zip code and party of the local US House member. We compare the opinions of those who report they are registered Democrats, registered Republicans, and no party preference or decline-to-state or independent voters; the results for those who say they are registered to vote in other parties are not large enough for separate analysis.

We also analyze the responses of likely voters—so designated per their responses to survey questions about voter registration, previous election participation, intentions to vote this year, attention to election news, and current interest in politics. The percentages presented in the report tables and in the questionnaire may not add to due to rounding. Additional details about our methodology can be found at www. pdf and are available upon request through surveys ppic. October 14—23, 1, California adult residents; 1, California likely voters English, Spanish.

Margin of error ±3.

GBPUSD Spread 1 pip thả nổi. Nhờ vào thủ tục đăng ký đơn giản, có nhiều kênh nạp rút nhanh chóng và thân thiện, đi kèm rất nhiều loại tài khoản khác nhau cùng mức nạp tiền tối thiểu thấp. It allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. Ngoài ra, một số trường hợp Fibonacci có nhiều đường cản giá nên giá hay bị đảo quay lại tại các đường này. Two of the state ballot measures were also included in the September survey Propositions 27 and 30 , while Proposition 26 was not. Coauthors of this report include survey analyst Deja Thomas, who was the project manager for this survey; associate survey director and research fellow Dean Bonner; and survey analyst Rachel Lawler. Panetta Chairman The Panetta Institute for Public Policy.

Categories:

• Binary Options
• Binary Options online
• Forex
• Forex Brokers
• Forex Bitcoin