Cell phone respondents were offered a small reimbursement to help defray the cost of the call. Cell phone interviews were conducted with adults who have cell phone service only and with those who have both cell phone and landline service in the household.

Landline interviews were conducted using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers that ensured that both listed and unlisted numbers were called. Additionally, we utilized a registration-based sample RBS of landline phone numbers for adults who are registered to vote in California.

All landline telephone exchanges in California were eligible for selection. For both cell phones and landlines, telephone numbers were called as many as eight times. When no contact with an individual was made, calls to a number were limited to six. Also, to increase our ability to interview Asian American adults, we made up to three additional calls to phone numbers estimated by Survey Sampling International as likely to be associated with Asian American individuals.

Accent on Languages, Inc. The survey sample was closely comparable to the ACS figures. To estimate landline and cell phone service in California, Abt Associates used state-level estimates released by the National Center for Health Statistics—which used data from the National Health Interview Survey NHIS and the ACS. The estimates for California were then compared against landline and cell phone service reported in this survey.

We also used voter registration data from the California Secretary of State to compare the party registration of registered voters in our sample to party registration statewide. The sampling error, taking design effects from weighting into consideration, is ±3. This means that 95 times out of , the results will be within 3. The sampling error for unweighted subgroups is larger: for the 1, registered voters, the sampling error is ±4. For the sampling errors of additional subgroups, please see the table at the end of this section.

Sampling error is only one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by factors such as question wording, question order, and survey timing. We present results for five geographic regions, accounting for approximately 90 percent of the state population. Residents of other geographic areas are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but sample sizes for these less-populous areas are not large enough to report separately.

We also present results for congressional districts currently held by Democrats or Republicans, based on residential zip code and party of the local US House member. We compare the opinions of those who report they are registered Democrats, registered Republicans, and no party preference or decline-to-state or independent voters; the results for those who say they are registered to vote in other parties are not large enough for separate analysis.

We also analyze the responses of likely voters—so designated per their responses to survey questions about voter registration, previous election participation, intentions to vote this year, attention to election news, and current interest in politics. The percentages presented in the report tables and in the questionnaire may not add to due to rounding. Additional details about our methodology can be found at www. pdf and are available upon request through surveys ppic.

October 14—23, 1, California adult residents; 1, California likely voters English, Spanish. Margin of error ±3. Percentages may not add up to due to rounding. Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that Gavin Newsom is handling his job as governor of California? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that the California Legislature is handling its job?

Do you think things in California are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? Thinking about your own personal finances—would you say that you and your family are financially better off, worse off, or just about the same as a year ago?

Next, some people are registered to vote and others are not. Are you absolutely certain that you are registered to vote in California? Are you registered as a Democrat, a Republican, another party, or are you registered as a decline-to-state or independent voter? Would you call yourself a strong Republican or not a very strong Republican? Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or Democratic Party? Which one of the seven state propositions on the November 8 ballot are you most interested in?

Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. It allows in-person sports betting at racetracks and tribal casinos, and requires that racetracks and casinos that offer sports betting to make certain payments to the state—such as to support state regulatory costs. The fiscal impact is increased state revenues, possibly reaching tens of millions of dollars annually.

Some of these revenues would support increased state regulatory and enforcement costs that could reach the low tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 26?

Initiative Constitutional Amendment. It allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands.

It directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, and nonparticipating tribes. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 27? Initiative Statute.

It allocates tax revenues to zero-emission vehicle purchase incentives, vehicle charging stations, and wildfire prevention. If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on Proposition 30?

Do you agree or disagree with these statements? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way that Joe Biden is handling his job as president? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Alex Padilla is handling his job as US Senator? Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Dianne Feinstein is handling her job as US Senator?

Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way the US Congress is handling its job? Do you think things in the United States are generally going in the right direction or the wrong direction? How satisfied are you with the way democracy is working in the United States? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied, or not at all satisfied?

These days, do you feel [rotate] [1] optimistic [or] [2] pessimistic that Americans of different political views can still come together and work out their differences? What is your opinion with regard to race relations in the United States today?

Would you say things are [rotate 1 and 2] [1] better , [2] worse , or about the same than they were a year ago? When it comes to racial discrimination, which do you think is the bigger problem for the country today—[rotate] [1] People seeing racial discrimination where it really does NOT exist [or] [2] People NOT seeing racial discrimination where it really DOES exist?

Next, Next, would you consider yourself to be politically: [read list, rotate order top to bottom]. Generally speaking, how much interest would you say you have in politics—a great deal, a fair amount, only a little, or none? Mark Baldassare is president and CEO of the Public Policy Institute of California, where he holds the Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Chair in Public Policy. He is a leading expert on public opinion and survey methodology, and has directed the PPIC Statewide Survey since He is an authority on elections, voter behavior, and political and fiscal reform, and the author of ten books and numerous publications.

Before joining PPIC, he was a professor of urban and regional planning in the School of Social Ecology at the University of California, Irvine, where he held the Johnson Chair in Civic Governance. He has conducted surveys for the Los Angeles Times , the San Francisco Chronicle , and the California Business Roundtable. He holds a PhD in sociology from the University of California, Berkeley. Dean Bonner is associate survey director and research fellow at PPIC, where he coauthors the PPIC Statewide Survey—a large-scale public opinion project designed to develop an in-depth profile of the social, economic, and political attitudes at work in California elections and policymaking.

He has expertise in public opinion and survey research, political attitudes and participation, and voting behavior. Before joining PPIC, he taught political science at Tulane University and was a research associate at the University of New Orleans Survey Research Center. He holds a PhD and MA in political science from the University of New Orleans.

Rachel Lawler is a survey analyst at the Public Policy Institute of California, where she works with the statewide survey team. In that role, she led and contributed to a variety of quantitative and qualitative studies for both government and corporate clients. She holds an MA in American politics and foreign policy from the University College Dublin and a BA in political science from Chapman University.

Deja Thomas is a survey analyst at the Public Policy Institute of California, where she works with the statewide survey team. Prior to joining PPIC, she was a research assistant with the social and demographic trends team at the Pew Research Center. In that role, she contributed to a variety of national quantitative and qualitative survey studies.

She holds a BA in psychology from the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. This survey was supported with funding from the Arjay and Frances F. Ruben Barrales Senior Vice President, External Relations Wells Fargo. Mollyann Brodie Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Bruce E. Cain Director Bill Lane Center for the American West Stanford University.

Jon Cohen Chief Research Officer and Senior Vice President, Strategic Partnerships and Business Development Momentive-AI. Joshua J. Dyck Co-Director Center for Public Opinion University of Massachusetts, Lowell. Lisa García Bedolla Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Dean of the Graduate Division University of California, Berkeley. Russell Hancock President and CEO Joint Venture Silicon Valley.

Sherry Bebitch Jeffe Professor Sol Price School of Public Policy University of Southern California. Carol S. Larson President Emeritus The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.

Lisa Pitney Vice President of Government Relations The Walt Disney Company. Robert K. Ross, MD President and CEO The California Endowment. Most Reverend Jaime Soto Bishop of Sacramento Roman Catholic Diocese of Sacramento.

Helen Iris Torres CEO Hispanas Organized for Political Equality. David C. Wilson, PhD Dean and Professor Richard and Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy University of California, Berkeley. Chet Hewitt, Chair President and CEO Sierra Health Foundation. Mark Baldassare President and CEO Public Policy Institute of California. Ophelia Basgal Affiliate Terner Center for Housing Innovation University of California, Berkeley.

Louise Henry Bryson Chair Emerita, Board of Trustees J. Paul Getty Trust. Sandra Celedon President and CEO Fresno Building Healthy Communities. Marisa Chun Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Steven A. Leon E. Panetta Chairman The Panetta Institute for Public Policy. DI Aceh. com TribunnewsWiki. com TribunStyle. com TribunTravel. com TribunWow. com TribunNewsmaker. com TribunTrends. com TribunHealth. com TribunShopping.

com Tribun-Video. com TribunJualBeli. Karir Tribun Epaper Gramedia. com Gramedia Digital. Google News. Profile Kirim Images Logout. Belum punya akun? KILAS Jakarta Bandung Bogor Jogja Solo Semarang Surabaya Malang Bali Aceh Medan Pekanbaru Batam Jambi Palembang Bangka Lampung Kota Lain Pontianak Banjarmasin Balikpapan Makassar Manado Kupang Sumsel.

Rabu, 16 November WIB Editor: Erik S. lihat foto. ilustrasi Terdakwa kasus binary option quotex, Doni Muhammad Taufik alias Doni Salmanan dituntut 13 tahun penjara. Baca juga: Eksepsi Doni Salmanan Ditolak Jaksa, Ini Alasannya Jaksa Penuntut Umum JPU menilai Doni Salmanan dinilai terbukti melanggar Pasal 45 ayat 2 jo Pasal 28 Ayat 1 Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagaimana diubah dan ditambah dengan Undang-undang RI Nomor 19 Tahun tentang Perubahan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Sumber: Kompas TV.

Putusan itu berdasarkan terbuktinya Doni Salmanan melakukan tindak pidana yakni penyebaran berita bohong kasus binary option Quotex.

Namun, Ketua Majelis Hakim, Achmad Satibi mengumumkan bahwa Doni Salmanan tidak terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana pencucian uang TPPU seperti yang didakwakan oleh jaksa penuntut umum JPU. Di sisi lain, hakim memutuskan aset milik Doni Salmanan sebagai afiliator aplikasi binary option bukan didapat dari tindak pidana lantaran regulasi trading dan binary di Indonesia masih belum jelas.

Sehingga, ada aset yang dikembalikan ke Doni Salmanan meski beberapa aset lain yang disita oleh negara. Baca juga: Breaking News: Doni Salmanan Divonis 4 Tahun Penjara dan Denda Rp 1 Miliar. Lalu apa sajakah aset yang dikembalikan ke Doni Salmanan?

Berdasarkan penelusuran Tribunnews. com di laman Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara SIPP PN Bale Bandung I, ada 98 aset milik Doni Salmanan yang dikembalikan seperti celana merek Valentino, sepatu merek Nike Air Jordan Dior, hingga mobil mewah Lamborghini Huracan Liberty Walk.

Selengkapnya berikut rincian aset yang dikembalikan ke Doni Salmanan dikutip dari laman SIPP PN Bale Bandung I :. Tribun Network. DI Aceh. com TribunnewsWiki. com TribunStyle. com TribunTravel. com TribunWow. com TribunNewsmaker. com TribunTrends. com TribunHealth. com TribunShopping. com Tribun-Video. com TribunJualBeli. Karir Tribun Epaper Gramedia. com Gramedia Digital. Google News. Profile Kirim Images Logout.

Belum punya akun? Breaking News:. Usai Bertemu Kapolri, Ferdy Sambo Beri Lima Arahan Ini ke Hendra Kurniawan. Home Seleb Gosipi Aplikasi Trading Ilegal Daftar 99 Aset Doni Salmanan yang Dikembalikan: Ada Sepatu, Celana, hingga Lamborghini Huracan Berikut daftar 99 aset Doni Salmanan yang dikembalikan usai divonis empat tahun penjara dan denda Rp 1 miliar subsidair enam bulan penjara.

Jumat, 16 Desember WIB Penulis: Yohanes Liestyo Poerwoto. Editor: bunga pradipta p. lihat foto. Kolasa Tribunnews. Doni Salmanan divonis 4 tahun penjara dan denda Rp 1 miliar. Berikut daftar 99 aset Doni Salmanan yang dikembalikan usai divonis empat tahun penjara dan denda Rp 1 miliar subsidair enam bulan penjara.

Halaman selanjutnya. Sumber: TribunSolo. Telegram Line Pinterest reddit Mix Flipboard. BERITA TERKINI. berita POPULER. Dito Mahendra Kembali Mangkir di Sidang, Nikita Mirzani Menangis hingga Mucul Desakan Jemput Paksa 6 jam lalu.

Dito Mahendra Belum Bisa Dijemput Paksa untuk Hadiri Sidang Nikita Mirzani, Hakim Ungkap Alasannya 4 jam lalu. Saat Al Nahyan Cucu Jokowi Viral, La Lembah Manah Tak Ada di Nikahan Kaesang, Kemana Anak Gibran? com,a subsidiary of KG Media. close [x].

It allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online and mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. Next, would you consider yourself to be politically: [read list, rotate order top to bottom]. For the sampling errors of additional subgroups, please see the table at the end of this section. com Gramedia Digital. BERITA TERKINI.

Categories:

• Forex Brokers
• Forex
• Binary Options
• Binary Options online
• Forex Bitcoin